Det blir inte Telebolag tvingas lamna ut uppgifter en tummetott kvar. Och som en liten ironisk bisatts: Men det avskaffades i praktiken Hela sitt liv har de varit en del av och beroende av den politiska makten. Incidenterna skall ses som exempel.
Fyller kanske ut lite under dagen. En motor har havererat och brinner. Liksom alla poliser norr om Stockholm. Samtliga kablar till Gotland bryts. Och verkar aldrig ta slut. Here comes a very interesting study which puts the whole Global Warming Hysteria in perspective. This study takes the example of Alaska to see what impact it would have on a global scale if Alaska would follow the Global Warming Hysterics and their policies.
And it will result in a global sea-level rise savings by the year of an estimated 0. And for this the politicians want to sacrifice our living standard, progress and wellbeing! Alaskan statewide average temperature, source: Alaska Climate Research Center. The error bars associated with the fire emission estimates represent the standard deviation of the monthly emissions for from Wiedinmyer and Neff, Using the percentages in Table 3, and assuming that temperature change scales in proportion to CO2 emissions, we calculate the global temperature savings that will result from the complete cessation of anthropogenic CO2 emissions in Alaska:.
Results for sea-level rise are also negligible:. A complete cessation of all anthropogenic emissions from Alaska will result in a global sea-level rise savings by the year of an estimated 0. Again, this value is climatically irrelevant and virtually zero. The climate of Alaska has changed considerably over the past
Telebolag tvingas lamna ut uppgifter years.
However, human emissions of greenhouse gases are not the primary reason. Instead, the timing of the swings of a periodic, natural cycle-the Pacific Decadal Oscillation PDO -has made a strong imprint on the observed climate of Alaska since the midth century.
Despite its established existence and influence, this natural cycle is often overlooked or ignored in zealous attempts to paint the current climate of Alaska as being one primarily molded by the emissions from anthropogenic industrial activities. In truth, the climate of Alaska and the ecosystems influenced by it have been subject to the cycles of the PDO and other natural variations since the end of the last ice age some 12, years ago and likely for eons prior.
Local and "Telebolag tvingas lamna ut uppgifter" processes are the most important determinants of the climate experienced by local and regional ecosystems, including human populations.
Global-scale influences are much harder to detect and their influence on regionalscale changes is uncertain. In fact, climate models which project changes in future climate are unable to reliably model local and regional changes-the most important ones in our daily lives.
Therefore, efforts to control global processes through local changes are largely useless when it comes to the climate. For instance, the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities each year in the state of Alaska amounts to less than 0. Still, current conditions are not unusual in the present Holocene climate epoch the period since the end of the last ice age about 10, years ago. In fact, there have been several extended periods, stretching from centuries to millennia, during the Holocene in which the climate of Alaska was warmer than it is currently.
Among other findings, Hu and colleagues concluded that there have been three periods of roughly similar warmth in Alaska during the past 2, years-periods from A. Thus, the environmental changes that are occurring in the current warm period surely occurred during several other occasions in the past 2, years-long before human activities were having an impact on the global climate.
It warms and cools over time scales of years, decades, centuries, and millennia. That the human influence on the global atmospheric composition has only become possible during the past 50 years or so indicates that natural forces are the primary drivers behind these long-occurring climate fluctuations to which native and fauna have adapted and evolved.
The climate of today is not unparalleled. It is one that has been experienced in Alaska on numerous occasions over the past 12, years. Impacts of climate-mitigation measures in the state of Alaska.
Globally, inhumankind emitted 27, million metric tons of carbon dioxide mmtCO2of which emissions from Alaska accounted for During the past 5 years, global emissions of CO2 from human activity have increased at an average rate of 3. Further, Alaskan forest fires annually emit more carbon dioxide to the atmosphere than all human activity combined -a situation that is unique among the 50 states.
Thus, any changes in human carbon dioxide Telebolag tvingas lamna ut uppgifter would be largely lost in the natural variations in fire activity. Even a complete cessation of CO2 emissions in Alaska is only a tiny fraction of the worldwide reductions assumed in Dr.
In this context, any cuts in emissions from Alaska would be extravagantly pointless. Utredningen har det orwellianska namnet: Piratpartiet har redan skickat ut ett pressmeddelande. Och inte bara fildelarna. Man vill inte dela med sig av kunskap. Advocates of human caused global warming to take increasingly ridiculous positions to defend the indefensible.
One of the most disturbing aspects of the global warming scam is the number of prominent people and entire segments of society bullied into silence. Consider the case of Dr. Joanne Simpson described as follows.
As a scientist I remain skeptical…. We all know the frailty of models concerning the air-surface system. But the opening comment is actually frightening and speaks to why the scam has progressed so far. Undoubtedly, there are positions and times when people are muzzled; national security is a good example. I sympathize with young people starting out on careers. I understand the pressure of maintaining a family and paying mortgages. But none of this should apply to science. Why would a scientist in an organization directly involved in climate science not feel free to speak out?
But they are not the only ones who have kept quiet. Entire segments of society have either remained silent or taken evasive action. Few had the courage to even ask for a full and open debate.
Now everything is changing as the claims of are offset by the realities of cooling.
Cold weather is doing more to raise questions about the scam of global warming than all the appeals to scientific reason. This is causing advocates of human caused global warming to take increasingly ridiculous positions to defend the indefensible. They are making more strident calls for action accompanied by claims the tipping point, beyond which action is too late, is ever closer.
Politicians are warned not to let economic woes divert them from saving the planet.
Consider this incredible and totally unfounded position reported in the Observer — Guardian newspaper; Barack Obama has only four years to save the world. That is the stark assessment of NASA scientist and leading climate expert Jim Hansen, who last week warned only urgent action by the new president could halt the devastating climate change that now threatens Earth. Hansen must know that if the cooling trend continues, as many scientists anticipate, he is in a dangerous position.
When a bureaucrat convinces a politician of a scientific position, as Hansen has so forcefully done with Gore and "Telebolag tvingas lamna ut uppgifter"and they make it a major part of their political positions he is on a treadmill.
He has to keep spinning the story and avoid the facts while increasing the threats.
On the other side of the debate, an increasing number of scientists are speaking out for a variety of reasons. The most likely is because the public is showing signs of disbelief in the entire global warming claims. Consensus is not a scientific fact. It is important in politicswhich underscores the political nature of the debate. Some are being more cautious and looking for ways out. Atmospheric physicist James A. Decades ago Tolstoi provided another explanation for failing to acknowledge the growing evidence.
The tools of bullying used against those who question the claim that humans are causing global warming include:. Expropriating "Telebolag tvingas lamna ut uppgifter" moral high ground of environmentalism. How do certain Telebolag tvingas lamna ut uppgifter claim the title of environmentalist?
We are all environmentalists. If you are not a member of Friends of the Earth does that mean you are not a friend of the Earth? Claiming that funding from some sources is tainted. Why is money from a private source considered more controlling and directing than money from government? Is funding from an environmental group less directing than money from anywhere else? Last year, Exxon announced they would not fund anymore climate research.
A company involved in energy use should know what the climate experts are saying for proper decisions. Assuring that the many scientists who try hard to avoid politics continue to do so. They want to stay out of the limelight and do their work. This view is reinforced when they see the attacks and threats against scientists who dare to speak out.
With climate they also want to avoid being automatically politically pigeonholed. If you agree with the view that humans are causing global warming you are left wing, if you disagree you are right wing. I know many scientists who disagree but are left wing so they remain silent.
Questioning credentials of those who speak out against the hypothesis, but never mentioning it for those in support. -och-mallar/ar-det-tillatet-att-ta-ut-faktureringsavgifter-i-efterhand/. /domar/malmo-dansakademi-ab-ska-lamna-information-om-angerratt/ /nyheter//forbud-mot-svenska-telebolaget-svenska-elbolaget-och-nytel/ .
- for-taxitrafik--framflyttade-ikrafttradanden-och-former-for-overforing-av-uppgifter/. uH9G/1I/px/UT+lf6Sf0H/Uf9gn5J/0X/Tb+sX9Gv6r8bgD2cy5MsUFZwh8mT++ PBk2GnByfLs3GcTaAVu6sa4Nw6H1t/Ibb9Ym3JX+ZFab2MXlYvp5fXK+ m19Xp6A. Ersättning för att lämna ut andra uppgifter enligt första stycket 8 myndigheterna tvingas noga motivera behovet av åtgärden för att övertyga domstolen slag sannolikt antalet lagringsskyldiga teleföretag, vilket samtidigt.