It is December, the month of the Christian holy traditions. Almost everywhere, especially of course in the churches, people are gathering singing Christmas songs. Hosianna, son of David, is one of them. Other songs are filled with Hallelujah outcries. But what is meant by Hosianna? No, it is not. Now, there is a slight predicament about this Hosianna-outcry. Most of us believe perhaps that people in Jerusalem called out Hosianna when the shortbuilt, slender, longhaired Jesus from Nazareth, who owned nothing but his reputation and wornout clothes, came riding on a donkey, followed by his supporters.
But this is not the whole truth. Hosianna was also yelled to the upper class, the Dirigenten i det grona rich ones, those who earned a fortune and had lots of horses and wagons.
Even people like those could be called sons of David. Who are we, by the way, today turning to and yelling for help? Hallelujah is also from Hebrew, originally written Hallelu Jah.
Hallelu means praise and Jah is short for Jahve, the name of God which by the way was, and still is, forbidden to express; that is why Jahve is called the Lord, or the Father, or the Only One, or the One Forever and so forth.
Hallelujah means thus Praise Jahve, or — better — Praise the Lord. It is December and the churches and other Christian congregations are filled with music and prayings for better times to come. And in the shopping malls there are, as usual, other things going on. And this is the rythms you can hear in those places: What the "Dirigenten i det grona" meant to convey with this is that a picture of a pipe is obviously not a pipe.
That he even bothers to mention this of course, to do with the fact that we humans often, almost constantly, mix up experiences based on fiction with our perceptions of a more real reality. What is it that we actually hear, see, smell and sense? This is not only a question for philosophy "Dirigenten i det grona" psychology, but is open to all scientifically active and interested parties.
Are the languages we speak and the texts we read the intermediary links between
Dirigenten i det grona on the one hand and an objective reality on the other?
In which case, would it be right in assuming that linguistic processes, in the broad sense, are behind the mediation of reality? Here we have a couple of issues that neatly bring together philosophy with modern sciences.
We people do not only react to our experiences with ingrained attitudes and behavioural patterns. We are equally as creative. Or are we actually more creative than reactive to our surroundings? Our brain is obsessed with creating, not only during sleep when it activates peculiar sequences, a sort of intensive, inner film studio, but also during the day as we trudge our way through the endless streams of information in an attempt to find out a bit more about ourselves and the world we live in.
These attempts are nearly always just attempts. We try things out, we formulate and reword, determine then revise, and everything goes at a blistering pace with most of it taking place on the unconscious level. And we are not even aware of what we are doing, well, not entirely in any case. This constant process of creating very often emanates from our frustrations, our feelings of dissatisfaction.
That which we hear, see, taste and smell leads only to intermittent euphoric raptures. Most of it lodges as experiences Dirigenten i det grona could best be described as second-rate sensations. And that is when the brain triggers its creative processes. Consequently, we form notions and ideas, mostly based on primitive images. Let me give an example. Within the scope of my profession I sometimes let people express their opinions on assertions of a more existential nature.
There is in all probability some form of Higher Power to which can be attributed all life on earth. Most usually choose 3. When I ask what criteria they use for awarding a 3, they normally fiddle their thumbs and look uncomfortable. There could, of course, be something out there controlling our every move that we people cannot really comprehend.
But we should not exclude the possibility of there being some form of higher power. Not a god exactly. That we people act in this manner has led to countless studies and papers on the subject, not only within psychology but also macrosociology how we build our societies and economics as a scientific discipline.
Previously, when it was more acceptable to mention people from the Communist era, there were names like Friedrich Hegel — and Karl Marx —followed by a long list of social philosophers, sociologists and natural scientists, all of whom attempted to explain the process of how we perceive and describe what we regard as reality. One of the most renowned German sociologists, Georg Simmel —studied how we interact with each other at meetings.
He claimed that all interaction takes place in a process in which the participants constantly form notions about each other and act according to these notions.
These notions are, of course, not randomly constructed, but constructed in accordance with the purpose of the interaction. We thus construct, usually at lightning speed and unconsciously, a sort of theatrical stage on which we take on roles and act out a play with each other that would put professional drama productions to shame.
Expressions such as these are based on a widespread interest in our time to separate and identify people as detachable and therefore recognisable entities. Even Dirigenten i det grona belongs to our notion areas, the origin of which can be found in Dirigenten i det grona politics that strive to protect our rights as individuals rather than as part of a much larger system that embraces family, workplace, a community, etcetera. Politics takes on the shape of a dramatized and often well-directed play, offering lively and attractive notions that entice views, but which could entail a risky voyage with many sharp rocks hidden under the surface.
Imagine if the modern people of the Homo sapiens species had coexisted with the Homo neanderthalensis and the Denisova two other, quite distinct human species?
Imagine if Homo sapiens had never created and developed the ancient soldier oath to be God-fearing and die "Dirigenten i det grona" King and Fosterland. Imagine if Homo sapiens had created completely different social structures than those we have today. Sometimes it is good to have a rethink, view things from a different
Dirigenten i det grona. Det har inneburit ett framsteg. Barnet befinner sig i den orala fasen. Jo, till viss del. Delvis ansluter Homburger Erikson till Freud.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Framåt Gröna Svarta Gäng (Auf Gehts). Framåt gröna svarta Vi älskar vårat gröna svarta lag.
Vi älskar våra och med Alex som vår dirigent och när Pärlan. Dirigent: Sun Erkensten Dirigent: Sofia Ågren Sofia (f) läser för närvärande på Hon har två somrar valts till årets Ulla Winbladh på Gröna Lund.
Han var musiklärare, organist och dirigent. I Halmstad var han med om att grunda stadens orkesterförening och körsällskap, och han var en central gestalt i.